Conversation

Replying to
Some failures are containable. If you schedule an hour to debug a program and fail, you can say “I’ll take another shot at this next week” and go on to other things. But it’s hard even when it’s possible. Failure drains energy and you want to warn it back immediately.
1
11
If you continue debugging for another hour, you don’t lose the sunk cost of getting situation awareness for that coding session. If you kick it to next week you can’t just pick up where you left off. You have to reboot. Pay the situation awareness cost again.
So regulating uncertainty is about containing failure forks. Adding slack helps with this. Parallel uncertainty is worse but rare in personal decision-making.
Hmm. Alt formulation: “keep the number of forks/futures you have to consider in time period T non-trivially below n” The branching factor of a time interval
2
7
One way to manage uncertainty is to expend a lot of energy to control all sources of uncertainty in the environment. This is the rapid monopoly growth strategy of unicorn companies. Commodity your complements, acquire all competition, buy up supply and distribution.
1
5
For individuals, this translates to get rich/fu$. Money is energy in modernity. Two more accessible (and in many ways more interesting) strategies that can work with limited budgets are robustness (simplify/minimalize life) and adaptability (reorient OODA loop faster)
11
Robustness or antifragility (distinction is irrelevant here) both attack uncertainty potential of modernity by striving for locally Lindy simplicity. Waldenponding and other defensive postures are uncritical special cases of this. All sacrifice performance for robustness.
8
Adaptability is the most interesting. You just try to think harder and faster. Get inside the OODA loop of the environment to pwn it rather than either dominate it or retreat from it. Those are the 3 broad strategies for uncertainty regulation: spend more, do less, think harder
3
14
Each strategy has merits, but only the last one can make life steadily more interesting and continue the infinite game. The first two define winnable games and try to win them. If you fail, you’re destroyed. If you succeed, you’re in an arrested development cul de sac.
2
9