So if n=2 “Drive to airport” —> “Get through security” —> “Board plane” turns into “Drive to airport” —> “Get through security” —> “Wait around 10-60 minutes” —> “Board plane”
-
-
Each strategy has merits, but only the last one can make life steadily more interesting and continue the infinite game. The first two define winnable games and try to win them. If you fail, you’re destroyed. If you succeed, you’re in an arrested development cul de sac.
Show this thread -
In last one: You view life as an asymmetric guerrilla warfare challenge. Kissinger’s “The conventional army loses if it does not win. The guerrilla wins if he does not lose” principle. Big upside of this is that you stay interested and interesting in the world. Not win+exit.
Show this thread -
Any uncertainty regulation strategy that looks like win+exit is a kind of acting dead. You can’t actually win against the universe in the end. We all die. Do you want to explore as much of it as you can in the time you have? Or hit a win condition and sit around feeling empty?
Show this thread -
-
Gonna attach this thread on power output expectation, uncertainty, and stress herehttps://twitter.com/vgr/status/1305953459217117184 …
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The cheapest one is do less. However, it comes at a cost of reframing, or significant awareness and mental control.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Think harder can have backlash too if imagination takes a more prominent role than synthesis no? It can lead to decision paralysis?
-
Uncertainty exists in reality but also in the mind.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.