The last one seems to be the state of the art. I read somewhere that you want to test at a rate that keeps the positive rate ~=<10% The question of whom to test at what rate (population, contact-tracing people, with/without group testing...) seems unsettled
-
-
Show this thread
-
I think if you're sincere and pragmatic, what you're solving for is minimize deaths subject to a meaningful measure of economic hardship for everybody else (which is not the same as GDP or growth loss for stockholders)....
Show this thread -
Seems like we're finally getting close to the right model for measuring the pandemic itself (even if it is politically unlikely to be the charismatic vanity metric) but we've barely scratched the surface of how to measure the economic hardship cost on others
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Number of
@Reflow_Labs Airsafes per sqf of community spaces weighted by some risk factor will be the next one. Building risks can vary a lot and contact tracing apps aren't accounting for this at the individual building level.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
LARPing math literacy is an integral-set of this mass hysteria.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.