You can create certain types of uncontrolled false consciousness state shifts (aka “red pill”) that way in people who are on some sort of cognitive brink, but you can’t create precise beliefs without impedance-matched relational evolution. You have to grow into belief together.
-
-
Whether you’re doing it for your buddy in the foxhole or for a larger egregore of patriotic feeling, you’re risking life for beliefs. Which are things shared with others. Completely not mysterious for a normal human. Trump is like a blind man who can’t parse talk of sight.
Show this thread -
This is also why it seems like a Trump has no beliefs. That’s because he doesn’t. He’s never entered the beliefverse. Only pushed buttons without understanding what they mean, because meaning rests on mutuality and belief.
Show this thread -
But you can’t say he exists in pure doubt like some idealized spherical philosopher in a vacuum, because to know doubt you have to have experienced, and recovered from, belief. As best as I can reconstruct what it is like to be in his head, it must be a sensory-aesthetic soup.
Show this thread -
Knowledge is far less satisfying than belief.https://twitter.com/vgr/status/1302123436798435329?s=21 …
Show this thread -
The mathematician in the joke still isn’t living with knowledge alone. He shares the belief-concepts “sheep” and “field” with the other two. It can unravel way more than that.
Show this thread -
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.