The key sign that you’re being owned by a unfalsifiable, uncalibrated textual tradition is that you’re encouraged to consider some core texts the truth ground. An “up is down” maneuver. Bible, Constitution, online ur texts, incoherent flows of mother-lode memes, Ancient Forums
-
Show this thread
-
The devious aspect of the more sociopathic online cults is how they pretend to encourage you to “do your own research, see for yourself”, but all the while nudge/funnel you towards their ur sources by yes-and-ing you where you happen to lean that way, and ignoring where you don’t
1 reply 2 retweets 30 likesShow this thread -
Venkatesh Rao Retweeted Venkatesh Rao
Depressingly exploitative and predatory.https://twitter.com/vgr/status/1297767323441348608 …
Venkatesh Rao added,
1 reply 0 retweets 14 likesShow this thread -
This is active vandalism of the fragile calibration instincts of vulnerable people. They don’t know they are onstage in a magic act with a conjurer. At least with cult gurus or faith healers there is a stage and an audience that might tip you off that you’re being played.
1 reply 0 retweets 15 likesShow this thread -
It’s like a Vegas magic act, except there’s no tickets and no audience doors. Only way into the audience is via the stage, and you only get a seat if you get fully taken in while on the stage. If not you’re out.
1 reply 0 retweets 14 likesShow this thread -
If you could find some way to deliver diy brain calibration at scale online, you’d solve mental health, culture war, and fake news, all in one shot. I don’t think it can be done. Calibration is expensive and painful and people have to be paid or otherwise rewarded to endure it.
5 replies 1 retweet 29 likesShow this thread -
Reality has a surprising amount of detail — John Salvatier (increasingly climbing the rankings in my best-things-ever-written-online) But... textual ity has a surprising amount of detail too. So it’s easy to get disoriented. http://johnsalvatier.org/blog/2017/reality-has-a-surprising-amount-of-detail …
1 reply 2 retweets 29 likesShow this thread -
The difference is that the detail in textuality is stretched out very thin over a lot of reality. And almost none of it is capable of providing calibration. Any random object you pick up around your home likely involves more detail than any Big History stretched over centuries.
1 reply 0 retweets 11 likesShow this thread -
It’s like increasing magnification without increasing resolving power. You end up with blurry or pixelated results. How do you complete the magic trick with such poor optics? The CSI Miami trick: “enhance!” This is the function of aesthetics and why I distrust aesthetics.
1 reply 0 retweets 16 likesShow this thread -
Through interpolation and smoothing, aestheticization stretches a spoonful of reality detail over vastly more reality. The aesthetic filler creates the appearance of additional detail but it’s dead detail. Not capable of supplying brain calibration.
1 reply 3 retweets 20 likesShow this thread
So maybe textuality has a pseudosurprising amount of detail. Like pseudorandom. Which is perhaps why GPT-3 can fake it so well in textual worlds.
-
-
Replying to @vgr
You don't seem to grasp the mediums, how humans use them. How illusions in our mediums distort online, how media pre-internet, lacking simplistic connections in belief-desire dyads running electronically, could appear rational. The game you're playing is with memory.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.