Some relation to people for whom words are either authentic-honor vessels of truth or utter hypocrisies. Never just imperfect tools for thought you grope forward with.
-
-
Show this thread
-
They get particularly mad at pragmatic perpetual beta working speech. They want either soaring idealism with a big halo or beefy eviscerating of enemies.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
'Anything' is a valid constructor
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
On the other hand extreme the greats in many domains end up operating on almost pure instinct (?) during peak performance,
-
This is a myth
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Formulations like these are interesting but... who? Where? You’re theorising on instinct, no?
-
I’m a super instinct-driven person. I’m just not attached to instinct moves and can pivot them when they don’t work. I’m also not bothered by my instincts being challenged, and willing to bet on opposed ones. The point is not that they have instincts but are attached to them.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Yes this! My first instincts are me. Everything I have a chance to think about is either fake or an act of service to others.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Even though most things of value are composed of many smaller things chained together and absolutely no one ever chained all those smaller things together in an instinctive first time perfect way.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
We are not our thoughts. We are not our instincts. I wonder how much English contributes (I am hungry) vs romance language speakers (I have hunger).
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.