Trickle down theory works in the wild sometimes. Apex predators eat only a fraction of kills and the rest is eaten by a chain of feeders down to bacteria. Especially true in the ocean. When orcas kill a whale, they only grab a few bites before carcass sinks to bottom-feeders.
Conversation
Replying to
There's an implication of this that's under emphasized:
Apex predators are more vulnerable than their prey populations.
What happens when, say, 1/2 the land deer live on is developed - that much less food?
Deer pop. goes to 1/3. Wolves go to 0. They die disproportionately.
2
Replying to
Bad association. Apex predators don’t have banks full of animals they plan to eat someday, maybe.
1
Replying to
this is an pretty myopic and linear cherrypicking of ecology tbh. put into larger context there is really nothing trickle down about it. for one thing “apex” predators / multicellular beings entire existence is founded on microorganisms in myriad ways. hierarchy is perspectival



