Conversation

Replying to
I find discussions of “no true democracy,” direct vs indirect, republic vs pure, to be tedious and nerdy distractions for those tempted by other things. As far as I’m concerned, boundary of democratic models is not set by idealized forms or mechanisms but a broad disposition...
2
38
...created by the urge to recognize all humans as humans and be recognized as such in turn. The democratic disposition stands opposed to the dehumanization instinct in any form. In all other aspects it can be unbelievably messy and still work. This is why to be democratic is...
2
39
... to be suspicious of political ideologies rooted in specific ideals. To cherish an ideal is to venerate those who embody it best, and dehumanize those who don’t. It doesn’t matter whether that ideal is divinity, nobility, merit, etc... to venerate X is to dehumanize not-X
2
22
The democratic disposition is tested most when you ask yourself if you’re willing to acknowledge humanity in its most corrupt, debased, stupid, weak, even evil individual manifestations. And of course in people very unlike yourself. This does not mean liking/relating to them...
2
21
The democratic disposition is not a saintly or expansively ecumenical disposition. You can freely detest anybody and hold them in deep contempt. You can even be utterly misanthropic and hate everybody and still be democratic spirited. Seeing the humanity in others != liking them
1
27
To be democratic is to recognize that others have as much right to exist as you, despite their flaws (from your POV). As do you, despite all your flaws from their POV. Perfection, perfectibility, or conformity to others’ ideas of goodness/worth is not necessary for you to exist
1
39
This leads naturally to a certain pacifism, a certain tendency to limit your own urges to dominate others, resistance to any impulse towards terminal destruction of others, and minimalism in defense of yourself against such tendencies on the part of others
4
20
Humans are capable of being monsters. Democracy is how you secure your own existence without letting monstrousness in others unleash monstrousness in you. Because seeing others only as monsters, with no humanity, is the beginning of turning into one yourself.
1
44
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
Knowingly overconsuming to the point that others are being dehumanized by deprivation is monstrousness. So in principle it’s accounted for. In practice detecting your own monstrousness is hard. By some standards you and I are monsters for chatting on Twitter while people starve.