I’m betting in less than 100 years if civilization does not collapse we’ll have surface imagery of exosolar terrestrial planets. Concepts for these are already being researched. It’ll be the greatest stretching of human consciousness ever.
-
Show this thread
-
I didn’t realize this until a few years ago, but we can already image stars other than the sun with enough resolution to see discs instead of point sources. Only supergiants for now. But damn
https://astrobob.areavoices.com/2014/06/06/can-we-really-see-other-stars-as-true-disks-you-betcha/ …pic.twitter.com/hunvTQpa01
1 reply 4 retweets 25 likesShow this thread -
Think how mind-blowing this is. For Galileo it was a real shock to see the phases of Venus and Jupiter with satellites. That stuff has gotten a bit meh now due to space missions, but imagine how huge it was in the 1600s to see discs other than the sun and moon.
2 replies 0 retweets 15 likesShow this thread -
You can still get Galilean soul-stirring goosebumps by looking at Jupiter or Saturn live through a small hobby scope. It’s not as dramatic as Cassini or Juno mission photos, but otoh you’re seeing LIVE images. Photons hitting your eyes are literally from Jupiter/Saturn.
1 reply 2 retweets 13 likesShow this thread -
It sometimes makes me very sad that so much of the universe is read-only. You can see it but not reasonably expect to get to it. Still the fact that we can read so much more than we can write creates a kind of life poetry out of our instruments.
3 replies 7 retweets 30 likesShow this thread -
“Ah, but a man’s teach should exceed his grasp, else what’s a heaven for?” — Robert Browning. This is not a universal sensibility though. One of the weirdest life experiences for me is that there are people who are simply completely disinterested in things they can’t act on.
2 replies 2 retweets 19 likesShow this thread -
Sherlock Holmes was one. He didn’t know that the earth revolves around the sun, and when Watson tells him, he days he’ll do his best to forget the fact. There’s many people like this. Agency or nothing. The read-only universe might as well not exist.
2 replies 2 retweets 16 likesShow this thread -
‘The purpose of humanity is to build bigger telescopes’ isn’t a bad philosophical axiom. It’s certainly more meaningful than ‘build bigger computers’ or ‘create more material comfort’ or ‘relieve more suffering’ imo. Ground species purpose in boundary conditions of consciousness.
2 replies 4 retweets 20 likesShow this thread -
Venkatesh Rao Retweeted peppermint bmo
Damn. TIL NRO spy satellites are probably more powerful than Hubble in raw optical terms though designed for spying on your phone rather than distant galaxieshttps://twitter.com/eigenrobot/status/1292596559184420864?s=21 …
Venkatesh Rao added,
3 replies 3 retweets 15 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @vgr
Defense engineering beats science for the sake of science once again.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Well not quite. Chicken-egg co-evolution feedback loop
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
I never enjoyed optics