Is there some sort of subculture of the maker movement that focuses on building stuff mainly from scavenged and jury-rigged parts, with minimal purchase of new parts? Any good examples or sites or subreddits? Cc
Conversation
Replying to
It is depressing that for most collections of random scavenged junk, even if very hi-tech, the most complex thing you can build out of it is generally “doorstop” or “art” (which doesn’t particularly interest me)
3
13
Junkyard engineering/mad-maxing reminds me of a weird branch of number theory/combinatorics called Ramsey theory, which is about questions like "how many randomly selected people do you need in a room for 2 people to share a birthday" (~22 as it happens)
3
7
Mutatis mutandis, how many randomly broken radios, based on typical failure modes, do you need in order to assemble 1 functional radio out of scavenged parts?
4
1
4
This is the simplest sort of homogeneous case. Ramsey theory covers a lot of such "structure appearing out of disorder via enabling conditions" questions
1
2
Heteregenous case: how many randomly broken bits of junk from from a particular subset of the economic production web do you need to assemble an arbitrary design in the combinatorial space. Eg... a 6-wheel vehicle with a snowplow attached?
1
1
I'm interested in synthesis side... what *can* you realize within the design space induced by the parts universe of a junkyard? Sort of like the Boydian snowmobile question (snowmobile = skis + motorcycle parts). How quickly does the expressivity of a junkspace increase with n?
2
I don't know if they count as makers, but farmers/loggers/miscellaneous rednecks with more skills than money keep old equipment running and bodge stuff together constantly.
Junkyard Wars used to be a fun show too.
1
3
Show replies
Yeah this is/was Tim Anderson’s “Heirloom Technology” column in early MAKE which he described as a “reverse Peace Corps” - learning/replicating/propagating more bygone or energy-efficient techniques.
2
2




