No smoke without fire = No noise without signal 
-
-
Right. To push the analogy a bit, fire is a specific signal you're looking for, and maybe the smoke comes from something else. No noise without signal, but often not this *particular* signal
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
“Noise implies signal” asserts there is no randomness, unless by signal you mean non-uniformity?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
So no such thing as chaos? Are you just talking about human domain signals? This seems like wandering into aphorism-stan, by way of nonsense-vania.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Wow. No offense but I did not believe this, didn't think an TV would be sensitive enough, but it appears to be true, this is pretty cool! https://www.astro.ubc.ca/people/scott/faq_basic.html …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
Like the joke about Stevie Wonder examining a piece of matzo. "Who wrote this crap?"
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Hawking radiation is pure white noise. It's the most important property of it.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That's it! Aren't signal and noise same? Only meanings change.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.