As per a cool book, pithily, slightly modified: contingency, path-dependently, becomes subsequent “necessity,” for better and worse, because constraint is both enabling and limiting. Luckily can often proactively and preemptively unroll some path-dependencies hot-swap style.
-
-
The first is about how telos/goals/life arises out of “dead” causal mechanism. He’s not a math/physics guy but he nails it better than math/physics/philosophers. (He draws on physics.) The second is about weak separability between a catalogue of levels of complexity and why.
-
I would love to hear other people’s summaries in 1 to 2 tweets. Micro book club.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The Wikipedia blurb on Deacon’s book is fairly accurate: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Incomplete_Nature …
-
At least on last reading (years ago, to be sure) it’s not “yet another mind/matter book.” It actually says something new. Several people accused him of copying their stuff, which I think is maybe a good sign in this case.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.