A big takeaway for me from this book was that no matter how bad things got, the commoners found ways to excuse even mad kings. All blame was directed at nobility later below the king. The purpose of a monarch is to be blameless source of hope to idiot commoners in misery.https://twitter.com/ribbonfarm/status/1280245808529465344 …
-
-
Monarchism might seem like a fun larp in LOTR, but actually living under monarchism (de facto or de jure) rots your brain. The contortions of keeping even an ordinary but fallible okay monarch blameless are too much. Pretending actual bad or mad kings are divine makes you mad.
Show this thread -
This book also suggested how girarduan scapegoat theory is actually a theory of rare exceptions. Scapegoats are nearly always lesser nobility and bourgeois. There’s an exhausting number of nobles tortured to extract “confessions” to various sins and then executed in this book.
Show this thread -
The American presidency has been a cult of personality for a while, with projection of monarchic yearning held in check only by the incumbent’s sense of their own limits and humanity. But it was inevitable that a mad potus incapable of that would eventually occupy the office.
Show this thread -
There ought to be an archetype you could call an anti-monarch. Like Sam Vimes in Terry Pratchett. The books create an anti-monarchist aura around him by constantly referring to his descent from the regicide who end monarchy in Ankh-Morpork.
Show this thread -
Trump’s base should be called his subjects. They behave like subjects.
Show this thread -
Nehru-Gandhi family was the only monarchical dynasty in India for a while. When they were out of power the opposition never rose to monarchic optics (even though one, V. P. Singh, was actual royalty). That changed with Modi, the first non-NG monarch. Fortunately he has no kids.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
He doesn’t even need to do it himself. As if on cue, the moons look. Soft a way to blame some democrat, and if that’s too hard, they sacrifice a republican instead. Q anon is the crazy version of monarch-apologia.
End of conversation
-
-
-
What’s interesting is when that concept flips - consider Louis XVI or the ancient mythic Swedish Kings.
-
Yeah it can flip pretty hard, but is rather than the excuse making
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.