A point I think I've been missing. WHO's noble-lying is mainly aimed at institutions not individuals. Anything they say gets uncritically translated to practice by institutions following "WHO guidelines" so anything they say is closer to code than speech nytimes.com/2020/07/04/hea
Conversation
If the WHO changes its definition of "aerosol" or whatever is involved here, hospitals and clinics claiming "compliance with WHO standards" as their outsourced brain might do a bunch of thoughtless things.
Replying to
The solution really is more institutions taking responsibility for their own thinking, and taking cues from multiple sources. Like maybe follow the practices of 2 local prestigious hospitals with the WHO recommendations as tie-breaker.
2
3
17
WHO recommendations should be thought of as publishing APIs, not human documents
2
15
