Moral devolution levels 1: Nobody should die 2: Minimal unavoidable random sample should die 3: Only bad people should die 4: Good people should die less than bad people 5: We should mourn good people who die 6: Those who died got unlucky 7: Those who died deserved it
-
-
Those with an appetite for inflicting suffering strike me as deserving special (negative) attention. As for the rest of us, too often we just drift along and accept/mindlessly participate in “accepted” methods of inflicting suffering.https://fakenous.net/?p=272
-
That's more or less what I was thinking. If you define "bad" as "will kill someone else at random right after the cut" then your moral rule drives society to a worse place... easy to go down the utilitarian argument here.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.