This thing by is fun. Reminds me of Asimov's thiotimoline paper. The double contextualization technique is a good idea. carcinisation.files.wordpress.com/2020/06/extend
Conversation
Double contextualization suggests a degeneracy: when your context and study's context are sufficiently same, it's just one contextualization and you can't actually execute the extended sniff test (EST) very well. So any hostility you bring to the party has to be outgroup.
Replying to
This makes me think: hostility is primarily a function of context distance, not intent. Even if you are *very* hostile to something, if you're too much part of the milieu it is from, you won't be able to critique it effectively. You need a different place to stand for leverage
4
