Conversation

Academia: Spend your life absorbing everything that's ever been said about a topic in order to hopefully add a tiny increment of original thought to it Tech: Disregard everything that's ever been said about a topic and confidently rediscover other fields' most basic ideas
8
340
Replying to and
Speaking as someone who has spent about a decade in each world, I’m pretty confident (heh!) that the problem is not that tech under-indexes on originality but that academia under-indexes on importance.
1
5
Replying to and
90% of academia’s originality claims are no more than squatting on easily rediscovered trivia and attempting to derive rents from teminological seigniorage based on versions of ideas that aren’t actually as well-adapted to field use as field-rediscoveries.
1
13
Replying to
i absolutely agree with that. i felt like i was criticizing tech more than academia when i wrote this tweet but they are both deeply flawed in different ways, and under-indexing on importance is a real problem from what i can see at a distance
1
3
Replying to and
one point i have that follows from this is that there are certain kinds of knowledge tech won't develop (particularly humanities stuff) bc it will keep rediscovering the same ideas (hence the narrow fetishization of certain books, etc). that's fine, but tech folks keep trying!
1
2
Show replies