Thing about knowledge degradation is that it is arbitrary and has only a weak relationship to retention desires. “It’s like riding a bike” effect. Ancient environment of evolutionary adaptation dictates that my somatic hardware retains bike-riding knowledge weirdly well. Shrug.
-
Show this thread
-
2x2: Knowledge you’d like to retain/lose vs knowledge that actual sticks vs degrades. Aptitude = Stuff you’d like like to retain and naturally does get retained, making maintenance cheap (it sticks with little/no reinforcement like bike-riding, which I actually do want to retain)
2 replies 1 retweet 18 likesShow this thread -
Venkatesh Rao Retweeted Tahsin Mayeesha
Curious that people find this to be a tragic line of thought. I find it liberating and am not really upset by it. In fact I kinda appreciate knowledge being naturally lossy. https://twitter.com/tahsin_mayeesha/status/1272191000803336193?s=21 …https://twitter.com/tahsin_mayeesha/status/1272191000803336193 …
Venkatesh Rao added,
3 replies 0 retweets 24 likesShow this thread -
“Use it or lose it” has a hugely important corollary: how much you have to use something to retain it varies enormously from “riding a bike” (afaict that’s once every decade after acquisition) to “must use every week and will be lost in months/years if not” like advanced math.
4 replies 1 retweet 22 likesShow this thread -
Your knowledge degradations form a unique fingerprint that create a signature style of how how you do new things. Like the gold seams on a kintsugi bowl uniquely identify its past of cracks and breaks. It still holds stuff, but in a unique way. Your brain is a kintsugi bowl.
2 replies 8 retweets 42 likesShow this thread -
Writing is a good example. Everybody retains/loses particular preferred/not-preferred words/idioms/usages that form a particular unique “voice” ... one that could be identified by an AI classifier and reproduced by gpt-2 type algorithms.
3 replies 1 retweet 19 likesShow this thread -
Feels like Homo sapiens is ready to evolve past uncritical fetishization of knowing for the sake of knowing (Homo... studentus?) to actual “sapiens” ("discerning, wise, sensible") by treating knowing as a commodity rent/buy decision for the most part.
4 replies 2 retweets 46 likesShow this thread -
There is certainly a kind of pleasure to learning and acquiring knowledge, whether to rent or own. But uncritically maximizing that pleasure is a kind of hedonism. We just don’t notice because society approves of it morally, and rewards it economically.
6 replies 7 retweets 62 likesShow this thread -
Erudition: What you know Wisdom: What you know about what you know Humbletalebry: What you don’t know Prowess: What you can do Nihilism: What you must do Scholarship: What you know about who knows what Craft: What you’ve forgotten Artistry: What has irreversibly degraded
2 replies 6 retweets 45 likesShow this thread -
Religion: What you refuse to know Tribalism: What you refuse to do Bureaucratism: What others must know Imperialism: What others must be able to do
3 replies 3 retweets 27 likesShow this thread
Previous 2 tweets are an inventory of epistemic identities
-
-
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.