Best to start with whatever part seems most interesting or easily observable, top or bottom doesn’t matter much
-
-
-
came here to say this
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
best strategy: switching between the three options every time you are stuck which level you're investigating (top/middle/bottom) should be the result of a good question relevant to an actionable task. super fast learning
-
Be curious to read a post describing this in more detail...
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Depends on how leaky the abstraction is. Less leaky = top to bottom.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I find an execution point where I can jump out of theory and into practice. Then I learn in a middle out fashion. I learned pandas first in python and then branched out into concurrency, ML etc.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Maybe something like rendering detail to a fractal from an outline.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Outside in - the opposite of middle out
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Honestly I have no clue. Top-down, in-out, whatever, I'll understand nothing for weeks until I suddenly understand everything
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I want a high level framework that describes how the top is connected to the bottom
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.