TV news is bending over backwards, both Fox and rest, to distinguish and totally separate protesters and looters. It’s nice optics management, but I suspect the line between them is much fuzzier than they’re willing to admit. Same demographics, similar psychographics.
-
Show this thread
-
In some ways looting is a less clueless response to belief that a system is illegitimate. Skin-in-game subversion. If protests were 100% peaceful and law-abiding with zero slippage into violence or crime, we’d call them parades. Identity performance with zero political potency.
3 replies 4 retweets 51 likesShow this thread -
I don’t condone what’s going on now because I happen to believe the system is legitimate enough for me, not because I believe in some well-posed absolute moral distinction between protest and looting
4 replies 1 retweet 20 likesShow this thread -
My good anticop/bad anticop emergence theory of protesters vs looters is not very popular it seems. Good anticops loudly disavowing bad anticops even though it’s clearly the combo that gets whatever results emerge.
4 replies 2 retweets 21 likesShow this thread -
Venkatesh Rao Retweeted Venkatesh Rao
https://twitter.com/vgr/status/1267237586382159874?s=21 …https://twitter.com/vgr/status/1267237586382159874 …
Venkatesh Rao added,
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likesShow this thread -
At this rate, I fully expect a tv commentator to suggest giving licenses and uniforms to protesters. Maybe even special “good” prisons for them where they have their own locks and keys to arrest themselves for self-serve civil disobedience. Maybe a system of ranks and badges too.
2 replies 1 retweet 13 likesShow this thread -
This plan is really coming together
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.