Fake bets on diversity look like effusive praise and superlatives of people who don’t appear to have done anything special to deserve it. Real bets on diversity look like pointless decentralization/distribution in projects where there’s an obvious, cheaper centralized approach.
-
-
sounds like you're saying more diversity -> reduction in bias, broader view of the problem. With less diversity you are more likely to set up the problem incorrectly. Once the problem is specified correctly, its just an engineering problem where the efficient team size is small
-
if the number of steps is >2, then you need diversity at each qualitative step, in order to reduce the risk of failure. But we frequently trade off model specification error for some convenient definition of efficiency that lets failure risk creep in
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Sounds like you are doing consulting work for Cirque-du-soleil. The best acrobats in the world are kind of boring.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.