Last week has convinced me that the End of Power/Moses Naim argument is basically bullshit, as is the idea of fully automated luxury space communism. This is not the final people's revolution but the zeroth robot revolution: neo-manorialism above the API, robotics below the API.
-
Show this thread
-
This is a tldr of an argument I've been developing that will take me several essays to unpack, so I'm not going to try to do it here.
2 replies 0 retweets 14 likesShow this thread -
Venkatesh Rao Retweeted Venkatesh Rao
Okay I guess I'll say one thing: I'm pretty much 100% in favor of this outcome. There is a deep denial of a reality principle in any sort of "end of power" argument. Power is life itself. It doesn't end. It just rearranges itself.https://twitter.com/vgr/status/1267136613185810434 …
Venkatesh Rao added,
Venkatesh Rao @vgrThe one big thing you can learn about popular uprisings from history is that they change nothing unless the classes above have reasons to seek a reconfiguration of power at higher levels. They're just flash floods that drain away unless parties with more power capture them.Show this thread2 replies 3 retweets 25 likesShow this thread -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @ankurrsharma
Where they go wrong is assuming that the ones who were on top under the old configuration of power will/should continue to be on top in the new configuration of power. Just because "the people" will definitionally never be on top doesn't mean the top never changes.
0 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
There is the well known Pareto circulation of elites theory (foxes and lions, basically liberal vs. conservatives), and in general, that's true. But there are times when new classes get activated and take power from both.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.