I’m kinda sick of the news media trying to manage expectations or even perceptions. Beyond a baseline of not inducing panic or extreme complacency, that’s not your damn job. It’s a stupid mission to take on that doesn’t benefit either you or the news consumer. It just adds noise.
-
-
When you instead take on the mission of random cherry-picked experts to declare that “the recovery could take months or even years” you’re not treating such claims as potential news to investigate. You’re just amplifying some entity’s attempts to manage expectations.
Show this thread -
And while we are at it, opinions are not news simply because you put them in the news section rather than the editorial section. If it’s an amateur vox populi opinion, either do a proper survey or bracket it as a sample opinion. If it’s an expert, let another expert comment.
Show this thread -
And you’re not in the business of judging abstruse dialectics either. If 99 experts say 1 thing and 1 says the opposite, that’s not reason to weight both equally. If your writer understands the subject deeply enough to argue why that 1 person is worth listening to, it’s an op-ed.
Show this thread -
News reporting is also not about “telling the story” (and I know this has been a big debate within journalism). Let the magazines do that. Or out it in your magazine section. News reporting is also not about “explaining” a la Vox. It’s about questioning the explanations.
Show this thread -
Journalism is the one kind of writing I *know* I cannot do. The one time I tried it was such high effort I decided never to try again. So as an essayist/opinionator, when I look at a piece of “news” and go “I could have written that” it means it is not journalism.
Show this thread -
The *only* difference between the writing I do as a blogger/“newsletter” writer and much of supposed “news” is that I don’t bother to call up a few easily accessible people desperate for the spotlight to comment. If you aren’t quoting reluctant-to-talk people it ain’t news.
Show this thread -
Access journalism isn’t news either. It is extended PR based on inter-institutional mutual complicity. The old definition is still the best: journalism is printing something someone powerful does not want you to print, everything else is PR. If you can’t live up to that...
Show this thread -
...there’s really no good reason for your existence as an industry. Blogs/newsletters can do your job, more cheaply, and much better in 90% of cases where expertise matters. This would be unfortunate. Because actual news reporting is something we *cannot* do and needs doing.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.