And to the extent the world is a connected web with the fates of these supposedly “better” states dependent on the west in a myriad ways — it doesn’t matter that they’ve done better in short-term local ways. In the long term everybody’s fate is linked to what ha;pens to the west.
-
-
If contact tracing is working & two people enter a store, with no prior contact, and one passes the virus to the other, who incurs damages, is the store owner at fault for not implementing distancing? What if both people took precautions eg. masks? What about store A/C units?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
The worst owners in the worst-hit and most dangerous businesses would reopen first, as they are suffering the greatest losses.
-
They're acting out of the most intense fear after people that are in the most at risk groups of dying from infection. I wouldn't trust their judgment on this matter.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I imagine the people with the most to lose economically would open first while the people with the most to lose health wise would be in a perhaps permanent lock down. There may develop a permanent welfare class of quanrantees.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You can use the reopening European counties as example. Cautious reopening. Lots of disinfectant everywhere.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
