You’ll derp about courage and grit (of course you will, because you’re likely in a low-risk group) and make a civil liberties anti-tracking case for fast reopen *without* surveillance. Surprise surprise that’s exactly what the economy-first types tend to do.
-
Show this thread
-
But they’re not entirely wrong, because there’s a second factor here... the economic loss curve is also uncertain and there’s a genuine case for fear that it might unravel catastrophically beyond a point.
2 replies 1 retweet 19 likesShow this thread -
Consider this speculative curve, capturing that fear... that past a point the economic breakdown is apocalyptic and irrecoverablepic.twitter.com/BJry7b7uFc
2 replies 2 retweets 20 likesShow this thread -
I won’t attempt to sketch the compound speculation but there are 2 cases here: A: the minimum death point lies before the knee of the runaway economic collapse curve B: the minimum death point lies after the knee of the runaway economic collapse curve B is a fake case, why?
2 replies 0 retweets 15 likesShow this thread -
Because if the min point is past the knee than the assumption of steadily falling covid deaths is wrong.... there’s no hospitals in a true economic collapse. And I don’t mean collapse in numbers bankers care about, I mean actual collapse of the economy.
1 reply 0 retweets 18 likesShow this thread -
So yes, we should ramp up test-and-trace because it can’t hurt and will improve the decision, but it won’t actually spare us the hard reopening-speed vs death-rate choices. Perfect measurement diesnt solve the actual problem. It only frames the moral dilemma more sharply.
3 replies 1 retweet 22 likesShow this thread -
But what nobody is talking about, because it’s fun to pretend the economy only matters to bankers, is a *different* surveillance problem. Not test-and-trace but location of collapse knee. It’s not about symmetrical V recovery vs asymmetrical V It’s about recovery vs no recovery
1 reply 1 retweet 21 likesShow this thread -
What’s the point of no return for the economy? This ain’t the low-tech works of 1918/Spanish Flu. This is 2020. We live in a very complex world atop an enormously complex tech stack. It can undergo far deeper collapse than the 1918 stack. There IS a knee to the collapse curve.
2 replies 2 retweets 24 likesShow this thread -
A big part of confusion is that “the economy” is being conflated with “wealth machine favoring the wealthy” on the one hand (Economy A) and with “measure of state of health of physical machine of civilization” (Economy B) on the other. Economy A is politics. B is engineering.
3 replies 6 retweets 44 likesShow this thread -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.