Fact checking is a worse-than-useless approach to counter programming bullshit. Brandolini bullshit assymmetry principle —“It takes 10x more effort to refute bullshit than to produce it” — applies doubly to fact-checking, so like 100x. You need better refutation models.
-
Show this thread
-
The ingredients of a good bullshit pie. The biggest slice is giving yourself all the benefit of doubt. The second biggest slice is the missing slice of topics avoided/evaded. Fact checking doesn’t work because it on,y applies to the smallest slice.pic.twitter.com/4jGHzr21PP
3 replies 20 retweets 92 likesShow this thread -
Both Goebbels and Frankfurt are wrong about the nature of modern social media bullshit Goebbels: the bigger the lie, the easier it is to sell (he attributed this to the British). No longer true. You want a bullshit palace based primarily on aggressively claiming benefit of doubt
1 reply 1 retweet 21 likesShow this thread -
Frankfurt: bullshit is indifference to truth/falsity. True only of casual confabulation, not politically motivated bullshitting. It’s still not scripted but the learned improvisational style of someone like Trump is far from indifferent. He is careful not to push clear big lies.
3 replies 1 retweet 15 likesShow this thread -
The primary mode of modern political bullshit is neither Big Lie based, nor pure indifference-confabulation. It is “colored noise.” The 2 biggest things to counterprogram are a) allocation of benefit of doubt b) things being actively hidden or evaded/avoided (eg trump taxes)
2 replies 1 retweet 23 likesShow this thread -
You counter a) not with “fact checking” since the facts are not dispositive, but by balling out a *pattern* of self-serving benefit of doubt allocation. The easiest way to do that is to mock the person’s stereotypical rhetorical moves rather than examine each case.
3 replies 0 retweets 26 likesShow this thread -
This is why the Alec Baldwin impersonations gotunder Trump’s skin. His moves were made legible through exaggerated imitation. For example, Trump’s been repeating “cupboards were bare”. He goes figurative when numbers tell a complicated wonky story that don’t obviously help him.
1 reply 1 retweet 19 likesShow this thread -
It’s a figure of speech so it’s not a lie. There’s no point arguing how many ventilators and masks in the stockpile cross the “bare cupboard” figurative threshold. Playing that game is guaranteed to bore peop,e so he wins by default. So what do you do? You mock the *pattern*
1 reply 2 retweets 18 likesShow this thread -
How would you script an Alec Baldwin SNL sketch for this? Like this perhaps: “the cupboard was bare, the shelves were empty, even the desk drawers in the Oval Office desk were empty. Obama used up the pencils. I had to buy my own pencils. Took me 3 years to do that.”
2 replies 1 retweet 24 likesShow this thread -
It’s not the best joke, which is why I’m not an SNL writer, but you get the idea. You can’t fact-check a slippery mix of facts, figures, and figures of speech.
2 replies 0 retweets 15 likesShow this thread
For b, there’s no substitute for investigative digging, whistleblowing, etc. Every big thing he stonewalls on, he also runs a project of interference, obstruction, intimidation, etc. So far he’s won by the “absence of evidence” logic (absence he’s engineered). He’s blameless.
-
-
Trump by himself is unimportant now. He’s done his damage for his handler Mitch, and is already in the trash can of history. But he’s installed a culture of bullshitting that so far has no cure or vaccine 4 years in. Time to build a refutation playbook that actually works.
3 replies 2 retweets 29 likesShow this thread -
Venkatesh Rao Retweeted Karl Unchained
And yes, this thread is bullshit too. Takes some bullshit to fight bullshit. White-hat bullshit like Alec Baldwin’s impressions. https://twitter.com/karlmaeser/status/1252390816795918336?s=21 …https://twitter.com/KarlMaeser/status/1252390816795918336 …
Venkatesh Rao added,
1 reply 1 retweet 16 likesShow this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.