My latest art of gig newsletter got me thinking about a general point of relevance beyond the gig economy. Inequality is a misframing og the real problem: bad fat distribution.https://twitter.com/artofgig/status/1248066039763484673 …
-
Show this thread
-
The current economy is optimized for extracting all surpluses and storing it in a particular concentrated form: high liquidity financial instruments that allow fat surpluses to migrate rapidly and frictionlessly to the current fastest growth vector.
1 reply 1 retweet 13 likesShow this thread -
The fact that the concentration coincides with a small population of private wealth holders is almost irrelevant. Any such high mobility concentration would hace the same effect: everything else has to be super lean and tightly synchronized. Great for growth but not resilience.
2 replies 0 retweets 11 likesShow this thread -
While wealth inequality may be a moral problem under some views, that’s not the main reason extreme wealth concentration is a practical problem. It’s a problem because it causes fragility. Thinking in terms of fat distribution rather than wealth helps.
2 replies 1 retweet 8 likesShow this thread -
To make it clear, such a distribution would be a problem even in a society that explicitly designed for eugenics and associated authoritarian values. Bad fat distribution is a problem for any system of values. Kinda like a potbelly is a marker of risk for anyone.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likesShow this thread -
“Good” fat distribution would store fat in a much broader variety of instruments and engineer friction and illiquidity so it cannot gravitate to fastest growth locus too easily. You’re not trading off growth for security: you’re securing the growth itself.
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likesShow this thread -
There now seems to be a consensus among economists that dichotomy between opening up the economy sooner and mitigating for longer is a false one. You mitigate longer to actually rescue the economy rather than just put it through a false dawn. This argument works long term too.
1 reply 1 retweet 7 likesShow this thread -
A better fat distribution is the longer term macroeconomic analog to social distancing. It prevents economic contagion from spreading as fast, thereby preserving growth potential.
2 replies 0 retweets 6 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @vgr
Are you preserving growth potential? The highest growth potential should be in the fastest growth vector, and roughly the same potentials are there and everywhere else during/after a crash. Or are you thinking of that vector as a plurality that can ruin the majority/everyone?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
You have to integrate the expected growth vector over a time horizon or something
-
-
Replying to @vgr
'Flattening the Curve' should work both ways, less to lose because of lower total potential. I can see a case for trauma of crashes/outbreaks making entire generations reject growth for security with an overcompensated loss of potential there, but that's hard to quantify/graph.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.