I generally don’t enjoy that band of authors for their shallow/facile theorizing but I have to admit: they provide a valuable service creating Schelling points of understanding founded in curiosity rather than fear.
-
-
That's a fair assumption. But it is only correct to assume that a widespread pandemic never occurred in India (or another place) until proven otherwise with historical records. After all, pandemics are serious situations and almost always mentioned in historical records.
-
Don’t agree with this or with the theory in the thread you quoted, but won’t argue. We have philosophically different approaches to epistemic doubt and skepticism regarding historical questions. These can’t be resolved by arguing about history.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.