Conversation

Replying to and
Really? Please explain why. I agree dividing per person is not enlightening, but per household seems to have some value. Don't say something about corporate taxes. Corporations don't pay any tax, they just collect tax from their shareholders
1
1
Replying to and
It's not like the government is borrowing money on behalf of the citizens, with citizens gaining a pseudo-liability in proportion to the amount of taxes they pay. Most of that debt will never be paid back, and the system depends on it not being paid back.
2
But that’s the point: you don’t β€œpay it back” in dollars, you pay it back in terms of constraints on future freedom. For eg: uneven inflation means you might have to work harder to maintain lifestyle, or accept a downgrade because the debt is paying to fix/heal stuff elsewhere
1
4
Thought experiment: in a village of 100 farmers, 50 come down with an illness. To maintain their farms in productive condition while feeding them, the other 50 work 2x as hard. It’s that or lose half the humans and their sunk costs.
1
2
Collectivized societal debt merely imposes a structure in such calculations. Tech predictably alters leverage (ratio of retirees to workers has increased 4x but total factor productivity has kept pace), But sudden increase in load means tech productivity falls behind for a while.
2
2
In fact debt is best understood as checks written against future tech productivity increases β€” ie innovation returns on economic activity. Which may not happen, or happen much more slowly, in proportion to the burdens.
1
2
The thing that's real here is a massive loss in productive capacity over the last month, and reasonable projections that this will continue for some time, and that the economy will be less efficient once the disruption is over. The deficit is just accounting.
1