Here’s arguing we’re in for a brutal and long recovery even though the narrative and metagame have converged on a short+deep recovery.
I’ve actually been leaning towards short+deep due to the 1920 recession, which followed WW1+Spanish Flu
Conversation
I don’t know why the market consensus might be around short+deep but my own reasoning is based on the observation that a lot of the long+brutal has already been logged in the last decade by a lot of people. It’s only the protected buyback-wealthy classes that hadn’t been hit yet.
3
5
The real economy isn’t in great shape, but no actual non-financial capital is being either destroyed or misallocated that wasn’t already in that state. And afaict no new kinds of non-financial wealth worth protecting are suddenly under threat. 🤔
1
7
I have a feeling I may be making some sort of “financialization dualism” error here but I can’t shake the feeling that when a Jenga stack of shaky financial instruments falls, it’s just not as serious as say a hurricane destroying a city or ransomware permanently destroying bits.
1
1
6
It’s what I call a control failure rather than a plant failure. Bad information washing out. Of course, it can later cause plant failure. That’s the Air France crash pattern. Bad pitot tube data —> autopilot goes nuts —> inexperienced pilot fails to override correctly —> crash.
Replying to
So long as you arrest the causal chain before the plane itself crashes, it’s a recoverable error. I’m not sure at what point the financialization control system crashes the economic plane. We’ve caught the pitot tube error at this point.
1
3
