Conversation

When this is all over, the question will be how to beef up things that collapsed under the stress. There will be calls to: Nationalize things that fail Privatize things that fail Distribute manufacturing more Distribute inventory more Distribute money more Distribute time more
2
89
This is the generic resilience debate that’s long overdue, via a “case study” that’s somewhere between a fire drill and the real SHTF thing. This is almost like the world itself is being administered a vaccine in the form of a partially deactivated crisis trigger.
2
67
There will also be narrower conversation around pandemic response innovation: Touch-free built environment Rapid testing Agile vaccine development and deployment Social distancing based culture
2
34
Conversations that are possible but unlikely to happen First-response acute mental health management Chronic stress management at population scale Ultra-wealthy flight/exit culture (cost of billionaire bunkerism, which is unfortunately totally a real thing) “Microgrid” economics
1
32
I’m trying really hard to make a fair comparison to what I remember of SARS etc. Especially discounting for the effect of apocalypse larping by we the Very Online. This does feel different. It’s like living through a milquetoast Michael Crichton novel.
3
26
It’s also very different from both 9/11 and Berlin Wall fall from what I can remember. Those were very human stories of extended impact. Here the star is a virus and the response after will be a reconsideration of the human-nature relationship, not human-human.
Replying to
It’s likely that there really is no living memory of something like this. People still alive (100+) who lived through Spanish Flu would have been babies in 1917-20.
3
18