Live-tweeting my reading of this book about golden age sci fi (~1930s-50s) here, which strikes me as very similar to blogosphere in aughts and 10s. But now meta-wondering about other pillars of modern mainstream culture that grew out of pulp magazine genres in that period.https://twitter.com/vgr/status/1233210973793574912 …
-
Show this thread
-
Detective fiction, romantic fiction are 2 others that grew in that era. Others have done less well I think — westerns/cowboy fiction has had declining appeal since then. Adventure/exploration fiction/non-fiction has become obsolete. It was already retro-colonial chic by then.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread -
Why 1930s? Depression psychology/sociology. The technology of cheap pulp printing dates to 1890s, but the demand exploded in the 1930s. Also took a generation of early writers to create culture, like 80s/90s internet for blogs. Also WW1 was a damper. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pulp_magazine …pic.twitter.com/cqLUwKylzQ
1 reply 0 retweets 1 likeShow this thread -
Yep I’m increasingly convinced blogosphere is the new pulp magazines. Analogy works great: volumes, unit economics, audience interactivity, community, reliance on communication media....
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likesShow this thread -
Note that these were “magazines” in a very different sense than today’s thin, color-photography-laden 8.5x11s with max 4K-6k features. We’re talking 7x10x0.5 all text. This is basically a paperback novel sized volume a month.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread -
They were reduced to digest size by WW2 paper rationing. That’s the size I’ve read. Old Reader’s Digests from the 1950s/1960s. Ellery Queen mystery magazine, etc. I’d say each digest = 2-3 months of ribbonfarm in word count. If ribbonfarm were a pulp digest it’d be a quarterly.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread
2020s of blogosphere will be like 1950s of pulp magazines. Greatest decade as well as last decade. Okay, now gotta go read about the glossies.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.