Conversation

Live-tweeting my reading of this book about golden age sci fi (~1930s-50s) here, which strikes me as very similar to blogosphere in aughts and 10s. But now meta-wondering about other pillars of modern mainstream culture that grew out of pulp magazine genres in that period.
Quote Tweet
I’ve been reading, Astounding: John W. Campbell, Isaac Asimov, Robert A. Heinlein, L. Ron Hubbard, and the Golden Age of Science Fiction by Alec Nevala-Lee. It’s a sort of group-bio of the invention of modern science fiction starting in the 1930s amzn.to/2VAgCTD
Show this thread
2
14
Detective fiction, romantic fiction are 2 others that grew in that era. Others have done less well I think — westerns/cowboy fiction has had declining appeal since then. Adventure/exploration fiction/non-fiction has become obsolete. It was already retro-colonial chic by then.
1
Replying to
Yep I’m increasingly convinced blogosphere is the new pulp magazines. Analogy works great: volumes, unit economics, audience interactivity, community, reliance on communication media....
1
2
Note that these were “magazines” in a very different sense than today’s thin, color-photography-laden 8.5x11s with max 4K-6k features. We’re talking 7x10x0.5 all text. This is basically a paperback novel sized volume a month.
1
They were reduced to digest size by WW2 paper rationing. That’s the size I’ve read. Old Reader’s Digests from the 1950s/1960s. Ellery Queen mystery magazine, etc. I’d say each digest = 2-3 months of ribbonfarm in word count. If ribbonfarm were a pulp digest it’d be a quarterly.
1
2020s of blogosphere will be like 1950s of pulp magazines. Greatest decade as well as last decade. Okay, now gotta go read about the glossies.
3