I could probably model this out properly under various conditions of time/cashflow, and the boundary conditions of savings/steady-job-income you would need to occupy various positions on the intensity (words/day) vs. chunk size plane
-
Show this thread
-
It's a constraint solver problem. If you have a job that pays X and leaves you with Y free hours per week, and you write at Z words/hour and want to target a chunk size of W, will you be able to reach an equilibrium output flow?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread -
Think of it as: if you can't spend
$x/word in one way or another to write at a given length, but still try to you'll produce crap. You might still produce crap, but without the base input cost you're kinda guaranteed to produce crap. Starving is not a good condition to write in.1 reply 0 retweets 1 likeShow this thread -
Let's work out what a minimum-wage person in CA might be able to do. Min wage is $13. At 40h/week that's $520. Assuming they balance their budget somehow, their cost-of-life is about $3/hour. If they write 300/words per hour in their leisure time, it's 1c/word input cost.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 likeShow this thread -
So by my cost/length curve, their natural chunk size is probably around 100 words if they want it to be good. They're best off tweeting rather than even targeting short blog posts of 300 words.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread -
The social psychology there is that the leisure hours are going to be so full of the stresses and anxieties of life at that income level, and the leisure hours available in such low-energy, smaller sessions, their output at bigger chunk sizes is going to be abysmal.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 likeShow this thread -
Of course there are outliers. People who've written great works in prison or while subsisting on food stamps or slaving away in gulags. But the very rarity of such cases tells you that it takes the force of enormous passion/creative vision to override the default sweet spot
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likesShow this thread -
It's some mix of mythologization, passion, special circumstances, special constitutions etc.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likesShow this thread -
tldr: there actually is a meaningful unit economics to writing, but most people are not aware of it because they rarely think in terms of production cost, only the realized market value... which for the median published public word is 0.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likesShow this thread -
Probably less than 0 actually. Negative if you count all those people writing words on non-free servers and not making anything from it.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread
Note that this entire thread is about just the input costs of writing alone, assuming nothing very special in terms of research beyond just casual reading you would do anyway/living life and using that as fodder.
-
-
Special research costs that can be directly attributed to the writing itself: - Reading things you would not otherwise read - Archival research - Interviewing - Travel for on the ground data collection
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread -
Research costs that should NOT be attributed to writing are costs that can be attributed to a higher-value output. Ie research on a time machine to write about a time machine is not really research about the the writing, since the time machine is the more valuable output.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.