If you write 1000 words a day at a current chunk size of 1000 words (so you finish a thing a day), that does NOT mean you can work on 1/7th of a 7000 word thing per day over a week. Nope. Chances are, if you work 7 days on 1 thing, the end result will be more like 3500 words.
-
-
tldr: there actually is a meaningful unit economics to writing, but most people are not aware of it because they rarely think in terms of production cost, only the realized market value... which for the median published public word is 0.
Show this thread -
Probably less than 0 actually. Negative if you count all those people writing words on non-free servers and not making anything from it.
Show this thread -
Note that this entire thread is about just the input costs of writing alone, assuming nothing very special in terms of research beyond just casual reading you would do anyway/living life and using that as fodder.
Show this thread -
Special research costs that can be directly attributed to the writing itself: - Reading things you would not otherwise read - Archival research - Interviewing - Travel for on the ground data collection
Show this thread -
Research costs that should NOT be attributed to writing are costs that can be attributed to a higher-value output. Ie research on a time machine to write about a time machine is not really research about the the writing, since the time machine is the more valuable output.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.