Conversation

Replying to
If WPEngine hadn't changed it's billing model, the last 12mo would have cost me $1477 rather than $2124, or about $18 more rather than $617 more (WPEngine counts visits slightly differently from google, so it's not weird that it would still have gone up despite traffic down)
2
2
And without cost increase, my operating profit from Amazon affiliate income would have been about $265 instead of a loss of $381. Moral of the story: the bar for profitably running a medium-high traffic blog as a robust, stable, CDNed, spike-tolerant WordPress site just went up.
1
2
It is kinda annoying... a quite literal go-big-or-go-home moment. I've never paid much attention to the economics of this so long as there was a slight profit, enough to pay for itself and overhead (domain name, mailchimp) and leaving a bit left over to subsidize paying authors
1
1
Where I draw the income/cost attribution boundary of ribbonfarm among my various activities is of course a bit arbitrary. I could add ebook $ on the income side for eg. or mailchimp on cost side. I've deliberately kept it simple: affiliate earnings > hosting charges = good.
3
Replying to
Do you have any wpengine affiliate links? Hosting affiliate shizzle pays more than Amazon 😁 Many blogs that claim to be about one thing actually just print money as hosting affiliates
1
Replying to
Well you've been down that rabbit hole for a while... But you also staunchly under-monetize ribbonfarm. Not sure the real lesson is that blogs are getting too cost prohibitive to run.... My static site blog is free :) (Don't get half a mill visits tho)
1
1
Replying to
Yeah, I'm not opposed to monetization in principle, just need a mode that's in line with how I like to operate. Right now, it's looking like best option would be to retire the existing WP-based ribbonfarm and move the future to substack.
1
Show replies