It is obvious that all religion is escapism but it’s not so obvious that all escapism is religion religion: belief in the net benevolence of things you cannot control if you commit to not observing them as well if you don’t look at it, it will be nice to you
-
-
There’s actually a decent answer (balance across yugas) but the point isn’t to go down that bunnytrail but to use the question to see a new aspect in things you’re ignoring, and then go down the bunnytrail of not ignoring them, which rapidly sucks you into very different concerns
Show this thread -
One reason I’m still religious about {sports, music, high finance, deep tradition} is that I haven’t yet nailed a lurking counterfactual that would allow me to stop ignoring them and start paying attention.
Show this thread -
Of course the main thing traditional religions try to ignore is “science”, which is why science-vs-religion is the classic cliche debate. Identifying the core counterfactual represented by science (nihilism, not specific disproofs of literalist beliefs) tends to drive abandonment
Show this thread -
Militant atheists tend to be terrified of the basic counterfactual to science: the possibility that life and existence might be meaningful.
Show this thread -
Yet another line of thought where I can tell I’m on the right track and it’s just a matter of getting the words right to efficiently get past all the predictable objections to the potentially interesting conversations.
Show this thread -
All my more serious writing challenges tend to evolve through that valley of the shadow of death by a 1000 semantic quibbles, because the words aren’t yet right enough to sneak past normalcy fields. Hacking through the OODA loops of well-rehearsed derp-defenses, one at a time.
Show this thread -
One of my Everests is writing a thing that makes interesting theists and atheists go “huh?” but derp-theists and derp-atheists don’t even recognize as salient to their concerns. Stealth kidnapping project, where you steal away core of a debate from people who think they own it.
Show this thread -
Heh, the primary example I had in mind for the original tweet was “market” and zero of the free marketers I usually argue with noticed
Show this thread -
A basic error many people seem to make is assuming everybody’s escapism is the same. Or more cautiously, that 2 people who nominally subscribe to the same religion must be escaping from the same thing. I have yet to encounter 2 people with even approximately similar escapisms.
Show this thread -
People who get closest are ones who have opted into, and paid a similar cost to enter, similar lifestyles. For eg, 2 people who broke into Silicon Valley at roughly same personal cost, to earn a similar lifestyle as reward, have similar escapisms, and therefore similar religions.
Show this thread -
I’ve been digging this damn tunnel out of Shawshank since 2015, and finally starting to get somewhere https://www.ribbonfarm.com/2015/01/16/on-the-design-of-escaped-realities/ … https://www.ribbonfarm.com/2015/12/01/can-you-hear-me-now/ …
Show this thread -
Curiously, and uncharacteristically, Buddhism adopts the strongest, most reified “all escapisms are equal” stance (dukkha) at an intellectual level if not at a praxis level. This is possibly a better definition of monotheism than “one god”... “one escapism”
Show this thread -
In this framework, procrastination is failed religiosity. Things you’ve failed to stop ignoring despite wanting and trying to. For example I have a failed religiosity around paperwork. Even as we speak, I procrastinating on some expense reports, tax prep, and a few other things
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.


