Even perfect surveillance doesn't solve the problem. In that case, the rage and resentment just builds up invisibly in the psyche, until it explodes, either in isolation (mass shootings say), or via collective aggression.
-
Show this thread
-
In a way, this is *the* central problem of our times, for both technology and economics. Creating a properly priced dignity market that can seek equilibrium without periodically exploding via beserking or rioting or other kinds of humiliation-revenge/dignity-balancing.
1 reply 1 retweet 16 likesShow this thread -
The problem isn't, and never was, technology taking away jobs. The problem is, and has always been, economies taking assaulting dignities.
1 reply 1 retweet 17 likesShow this thread -
Not sure how to approach solving the problem, but a good starting point is, if you have to have a policy that your employees have to act nice in certain ways beyond the natural niceness levels of random pairs of humans, you're creating an invisible dignity deficit
1 reply 1 retweet 10 likesShow this thread -
That, or you're somehow hiring exactly the wrong people. Like selecting the naturally rudest sorts of people for waiter jobs. Which is... not smart. Selecting for natural cheery/nice temperament otoh is fine. But demanding 15 pieces of flair means you're doing dignitynomics wrong
1 reply 0 retweets 7 likesShow this thread -
And if otoh, your mix of incentives draws only the desperate who will comply with any kind of absurdly dignity assaulting policy, it means you're a predatory business. You're arbitraging baseline levels of misery/desperation and externalizing the costs.
1 reply 1 retweet 13 likesShow this thread -
A much more explicit example of this is if your employees have to seek social welfare like food stamps to make ends meet in your full-time job. That's a straight-up subsidy you're taking advantage of. The state keeps 'em breathing, you suck out what life remains in them.
1 reply 0 retweets 12 likesShow this thread -
There's an argument to be made here that this is the main problem with inequality. It is a condition stabilized by an accumulating dignity deficit problem that will blow up in our faces at some point and destroy wealth.
1 reply 0 retweets 9 likesShow this thread -
Now of course, there is such a thing as a reasonable expectation of respect for dignity that can get very unreasonable indeed. Here the US actually has good priors: nobody is any better or worse than anyone else.
2 replies 0 retweets 7 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @vgr
(This specific tweet deserves a footnote about US class mythologies because while that is by consensus everyone's belief about what they believe, the country is mostly a quilt-work of class identities that involve being better than anyone else.)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
oh totally, paul fussell etc. the thing is, that's still way better than explicit consensus about dignity tiers as in UK or India
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.