Since WW2, the story of humanity has increasingly been the story of the top 100 or so charismatic big cities. The ones that can each lay claim to an important subplot of the human story. Not necessarily the biggest ones but the ones that you instantly associate with a big story.
-
-
One more, since it’s personally relevant. Seattle: globalization The thing about living in one of these Story Cities means you’re kinda auditioning for a bit role in one of these Currents of History stories. And quitting and going to a no-story city means you’re giving up.
Show this thread -
Wonder if you could compute the “story premium” of a city somehow, in terms of per capita gdp and rentbor something.
Show this thread -
The narrativium is strong in charismatic big cities People go because they feel a story void, they leave because waiting to be cast in a role gets too costly. If you’re lucky you leave with a new story that doesn’t require a million-people worth of narrativium critical mass
Show this thread -
-
I’ll know where/how to move out of Charismatic Bigcity world when I make up my personal post-premium-mediocre story.
Show this thread -
Home ownership was probably the big story between civil war and WW2 in the US. That got locked down and tied to urban futures by the civil rights era. Today, the story of your home is entirely a function of the story of your city. So you bet on cities.
Show this thread -
People commenting that this charismatic cities saga has always been the case. Not true. The shift of civilizational center of gravity from rural to urban wasn’t complete till WW2 even in the west. Before then cities were charismatic sidekicks.
Show this thread -
University towns are interesting. They’ve played a small but continuous role since about 900 AD, and more patchily (and merged with monastic cities) before that. But it took state intervention (eg Morrill land grant) to prevent them from converging with charismatic big cities.
Show this thread -
Linking in the personal decision thread here https://twitter.com/vgr/status/1226382240956866560?s=21 …https://twitter.com/vgr/status/1226382240956866560 …
Show this thread -
6 reasons people move from city A to B: - got a nice oppportunity in B that overrode any A/B prefs - hate A, took the first exit - love B, took the first entry point regardless of cost - tax/citizenship issues - cutting costs - family responsibilities (child/elder)
Show this thread -
I think I have a whole unconscious narrative-extension theory of geographic mobility that I operate by. I should write it up. Everybody actually operates by this but pretends they are operating by their spreadsheet. The spreadsheet is important but only 1/3 of what’s going on.
Show this thread -
Yo
@vr00n didn’t you do some data analysis of BLS data on where people tend to move to from different cities?Show this thread -
I should start a “where to move to?” consulting practice. I’ve done it enough, for enough different reasons and varied reasons, in both single and married states. Only version I have no experience with is children-included version.
Show this thread -
There’s also narrative trends playing out across many cities like gentrification. Wanting to live near a Whole Foods or Trader Joe’s (which we do) marks your narrative as premium mediocre for example.
Show this thread -
Multinationals should really be called multiurbans especially in the knowledge economy
Show this thread -
This is overdue for being moved to draft-blog-post status (working title: Urban Narrativium) but I'm feeling lazy so will work out a couple more bunnytrails here on twitter.
Show this thread -
In the US, there is a weird geographic correlate of narrative destiny: roughly NE to SW. Manifest destiny is part of dustbin of history now, but this tendency still exists. Your story is moving forward to the extent it's moving NE-SW. NW and SE are sideways. SW-NE is regression.
Show this thread -
The simplest nominal hero's journey, in geographic terms, is moving from Boston to LA and coming back a movie star or something. If you lack the ambition for it, you go NW to PNW for the Blue-White variant, or SE for the Red-White variant.
Show this thread -
Vast oversimplification of course, but you could get a zeroth-order linear story of your life as progress/regress by projecting your geographic movement on a NE-SW diagonal line.
Show this thread -
For example, my story is: [India-->], Ann Arbor, Austin, Ann Arbor, Ithaca, Rochester, DC, Vegas, Seattle, LA. Or PSSRSRPPP. P= progress S=sideways R=regress
Show this thread -
If I make it a bit more complex and weight a leg in inverse proportion to distance from Boston-LA turnpike, I could code my Rochester-DC move as "progress" (projection moved backwards, but I got closer to the turnpike). It's a bit like doubling back to ramp onto a highway.
Show this thread -
In general, the topology is more complex of course. SF to Midland, TX is severe regression, but SF to Austin is more of a mild regression, with a lot of sideways. The network of major cities has its own topology, which distorts the base R^2 plane topology.
Show this thread -
The biggest political conflict in the US is probably between those who are invested in the current topology of the Narrative Highway System (NHS) of the US and those who think it is decay and decline.
Show this thread -
The American Dream, unlike Old World life scripts, has always had a very high-legibility geographic component. Indian dream scripts for example, do NOT have such a strong geographic component. There's at best a very weak "going to Bombay to join Bollywood" narrative.
Show this thread -
At best there is a weak, generic provinces --> big city narrative without strong bindings for particular big cities. I think this is because America only has a brief peasant history, and no old cities, so entire narrative imagination gets projected onto network of young cities.
Show this thread -
"imaginations which have no peasant traditions to give them character but flutter and flaunt — sheer rags-succumbing without emotion save numbed terror” -- To Elsie, by William Carlos Williams ht
@nils_gilman for this key point.https://www.poetryfoundation.org/poems/46485/to-elsie …Show this thread -
If I had to get all mathematical and imagine a topology for US narrative space, I'd make it a planar graph of charismatic cities, with an extra node in the middle titled "heartland" to which all of flyover country is mapped. Sounds callous, but that's really it.
Show this thread -
The American heartland is a trope more than a place. Specific interstices within the city graphs do not have strong identities. At best, you can decompose "heartland" into "Midwest", "Texas", "Prairies" and "Old South", and those are not intrinsic, but artifacts of global history
Show this thread -
By contrast, agrarian heartland of India for instance, is strongly differentiated. Starting with entire mutually unintelligible languages. If you did a narrative-space graph of India, ratio would be reversed. There would be few charismatic cities, many charismatic heartlands.
Show this thread -
This means, as narrative spaces go, the US is peculiarly tractable. Stories that play out on the charismatic-city narrative graph are unusually legible in way old world stories are not. That's why, for instance, a road trip is a better narrative template in the US than elsewhere.
Show this thread - 4 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.