Conversation

Replying to
London: finance New York: art DC, Moscow: Rule the world SF: Tech LA: Movies Bombay, Hong Kong: alt movies Tokyo: Future, v1.0 Seoul: Alt-Tokyo Berlin: Spy vs Spy Paris: Culture Dubai: Oil Singapore: Perfection aspiration Beijing: Mysterious Future Rio: Party ... rest=homework
8
82
One more, since it’s personally relevant. Seattle: globalization The thing about living in one of these Story Cities means you’re kinda auditioning for a bit role in one of these Currents of History stories. And quitting and going to a no-story city means you’re giving up.
5
46
Wonder if you could compute the “story premium” of a city somehow, in terms of per capita gdp and rentbor something.
3
17
The narrativium is strong in charismatic big cities People go because they feel a story void, they leave because waiting to be cast in a role gets too costly. If you’re lucky you leave with a new story that doesn’t require a million-people worth of narrativium critical mass
2
25
I’ll know where/how to move out of Charismatic Bigcity world when I make up my personal post-premium-mediocre story.
1
15
Home ownership was probably the big story between civil war and WW2 in the US. That got locked down and tied to urban futures by the civil rights era. Today, the story of your home is entirely a function of the story of your city. So you bet on cities.
3
12
People commenting that this charismatic cities saga has always been the case. Not true. The shift of civilizational center of gravity from rural to urban wasn’t complete till WW2 even in the west. Before then cities were charismatic sidekicks.
3
19
University towns are interesting. They’ve played a small but continuous role since about 900 AD, and more patchily (and merged with monastic cities) before that. But it took state intervention (eg Morrill land grant) to prevent them from converging with charismatic big cities.
1
22
Linking in the personal decision thread here
Quote Tweet
“Where to live next year” decision is turning out to be NP-hard. Wife and I are gleefully vetoing each other’s ideas and getting nowhere. “Too snowy” “Too dry” “I need a decent airport” “Need a Whole Foods” ... Megacities: unsustainably overpriced Schelling points from hell.
Show this thread
1
3
6 reasons people move from city A to B: - got a nice oppportunity in B that overrode any A/B prefs - hate A, took the first exit - love B, took the first entry point regardless of cost - tax/citizenship issues - cutting costs - family responsibilities (child/elder)
4
14
I think I have a whole unconscious narrative-extension theory of geographic mobility that I operate by. I should write it up. Everybody actually operates by this but pretends they are operating by their spreadsheet. The spreadsheet is important but only 1/3 of what’s going on.
3
11
I should start a “where to move to?” consulting practice. I’ve done it enough, for enough different reasons and varied reasons, in both single and married states. Only version I have no experience with is children-included version.
2
10
There’s also narrative trends playing out across many cities like gentrification. Wanting to live near a Whole Foods or Trader Joe’s (which we do) marks your narrative as premium mediocre for example.
1
6
This is overdue for being moved to draft-blog-post status (working title: Urban Narrativium) but I'm feeling lazy so will work out a couple more bunnytrails here on twitter.
1
1
In the US, there is a weird geographic correlate of narrative destiny: roughly NE to SW. Manifest destiny is part of dustbin of history now, but this tendency still exists. Your story is moving forward to the extent it's moving NE-SW. NW and SE are sideways. SW-NE is regression.
1
3
The simplest nominal hero's journey, in geographic terms, is moving from Boston to LA and coming back a movie star or something. If you lack the ambition for it, you go NW to PNW for the Blue-White variant, or SE for the Red-White variant.
1
1
Vast oversimplification of course, but you could get a zeroth-order linear story of your life as progress/regress by projecting your geographic movement on a NE-SW diagonal line.
1
2
For example, my story is: [India-->], Ann Arbor, Austin, Ann Arbor, Ithaca, Rochester, DC, Vegas, Seattle, LA. Or PSSRSRPPP. P= progress S=sideways R=regress
2
1
If I make it a bit more complex and weight a leg in inverse proportion to distance from Boston-LA turnpike, I could code my Rochester-DC move as "progress" (projection moved backwards, but I got closer to the turnpike). It's a bit like doubling back to ramp onto a highway.
1
1
In general, the topology is more complex of course. SF to Midland, TX is severe regression, but SF to Austin is more of a mild regression, with a lot of sideways. The network of major cities has its own topology, which distorts the base R^2 plane topology.
2
1
The biggest political conflict in the US is probably between those who are invested in the current topology of the Narrative Highway System (NHS) of the US and those who think it is decay and decline.
1
3