Conversation

It also struck me reading your thing why I find some approaches to science popularization just... bad. Like Neil DeGrasse Tyson style. They mystify the thought processes and fetishize the latest version of the “facts”. Shock-and-awe scientism. It might as well be religion.
1
5
If you did Cosmos v 3.0, I can see you building up stacks of methods each episode using bathtub type ideas that get you to say a basic appreciation of something esoteric like “black hole surface information” where Tyson would present a parade of Hubble pictures signifying nothing
3