This is a joke (and a great illustration), but I seriously am strongly opposed to people who advocate not teaching the Bohr model.https://twitter.com/InertialObservr/status/1222030996981215233 …
-
-
Your style is to clarify the methods even if it doesn’t get you to the leading edge of facts. Thus is superior. The edge can shift/backslide, but methods of thought, like “model classically and quantize” create patterns of thought that I suspect are the actual content of science.
-
If you did Cosmos v 3.0, I can see you building up stacks of methods each episode using bathtub type ideas that get you to say a basic appreciation of something esoteric like “black hole surface information” where Tyson would present a parade of Hubble pictures signifying nothing
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.