I think you’re talking past each other here Goddess/feminine spirituality is a sort of self-starter SMB spirituality thing, which is in defiance of orthodoxy I think QC is trying to talk about the “missing market” of the male equivalent heterodoxy
-
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
Worse, but easier to market. Like I said, someone's gonna make bank. (Several someones, if you count Petersen et. al. as already inhabiting this market.)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
A deeper driver is that people need to feel seen as complete and coherent identity bundles. We aren’t used to inhabiting unbundled, fragmentary social identities. But it’s possible. Hedgehog/fox applied to the self. Those who need to be One Big Thing instead of many little things
-
Definitely possible. Ask me how I know. (It can make dating a bit confusing, though. "So what are you?" ". . . politely horny?")
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I thought there would be a fork to our Culture War. Exploring "If gender is fluid----self is fluid----is self real----mind creates self----mind as tool? Most thought is dicey at best?" But nope. Back to cycle.
-
Hoping for sudden mass enlightenment is a pretty common way to make yourself sad about the human condition, yeah. Baby steps, yo. Rome was not Christianized in a day.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.