Conversation

Replying to and
I think you’re talking past each other here Goddess/feminine spirituality is a sort of self-starter SMB spirituality thing, which is in defiance of orthodoxy I think QC is trying to talk about the “missing market” of the male equivalent heterodoxy
6
17
Replying to and
What QC is asking for is a very improbable niche-within-niche thing where the “unit economics” don’t work. Like 1% of straight guys might be interested in “Masculine Spirituality”, and the framing is so contaminated that barely anybody worth talking to is going to touch it
2
14
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
Yes. This is actually a very strong argument with a good deal of historical evidence for it. “Spirituality” has often been defined around essentialized feminine patterns of relating and knowing, both formally/institutionally, and in folk practices.
2
3
You’re narrowly focused on one “feature” of inner traditions (the therapeutic value of varied modes of emotional access), but incumbents have many more features than just that. You can choose to center an access mode like crying, but a lot more features are needed to compete.
2
4