The scheme seems to be confusing people. The subjective scale is binary, how it feels: from ok to life-is-hell. The objective scale is your assessment of badness in the range of things that could happen. If the answer to “can this get worse” is “yes” you’re not yet at 100.
-
-
Show this thread
-
Some days a 4/100 event can put you in a life-is-hell mood, other days, you’ll laugh off even an 85/100 event
Show this thread -
This is confusing and I should clean it up. Will do it if I play more with this.
Show this thread -
Spoon theory people are in a state where say the 10th event is the hell-switch event no matter what the sequence of 10 events is. Fixed price psyche economy.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Bad taxi ride- 3/100
-
Really? That would put you in life-sucks mode?
- 7 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
I actually hate this question because I think overall quality of life will have a lot to do with stress tolerance.
-
That’s what the question is meant to probe. Low quality of life means lower levels of objective stress will knock you out. Straw that breaks a camel’s back etc. Or what we call marginal sensitivity analysis in systems modeling.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
The number is rhetorically some sort of objective measure of severity in my model even if it doesn’t cause the most severe subjective reaction. Also it’s not a single event but a complex one whose implications sink in over lots of more concrete events as it progresses.
- 2 more replies
New conversation
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.