Debate is just using an adversarial discovery process to reach a shared understanding.
-
-
-
...when approached correctly.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
eigen no!
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
real debate happens in the town square with flintlock pistols at dawn
-
this but with broadswords instead and unironically
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Happy to come across that stance on the scientific method in the wild - haven’t seen it very often outside of philosophy publications. I love “Against Method”pic.twitter.com/Dlk4mWosSC
-
Although in my mind a debate is naturally unstructured, chaotic and anarchistic. Not beaurocratic at all. A few debates get weird, foolish structured formats, but most that we participate in are unstructured
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Well considering that actual action is not on the calendar
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Both are knowledge-finding methods for *groups*, not individuals. Both are about convincing the audience, not about convincing the participants.
-
You see the same pointless rote make work in social science or history. Listen to 95% of the authors on New Books in ... and be bored out of your mind. Few understand originality rather than mimesis, even fewer practice it.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.