It’s a fragile equilibrium. I suspect the habitable Goldilocks zone for corporations to exist at all is quite narrow. They’ve probably gotten too strong.
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
is this neo liberalism?
@mc_swm - End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Without other imperatives, corporations prefer employee precarity (via private healthcare in US primarily) to any public safety net. This preference for serfs seems worse than any inefficiency introduced into the labor market by collective bargaining.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thankfully, it’s hard to keep labor markets static, although the direction is rarely good. All else being equal, a vicious cycle develops where shrinking wages implies the shrinking of demand implies a greater impetus to shrink cost of labor.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
So sad that coercion drives employment strategy. How about creating conditions where people want to work for you. That’s the future
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.