I find I don’t enjoy review-summaries unless I have a sense of why the reviewer is reading, what their own larger project is. If their larger project is just something like “read 100 books on X” I get bored. That shtick was interesting 5 years ago.
Conversation
This is one of my “I’m probably the asshole here” opinions
1
25
Looks like I last did a review/summary myself in 2011. I think I just got bored of doing these even when they are inline with my projects. I don’t have the requisite community service mentality.
2
10
Yeah definitely feel like an asshole posting this thread especially since I drafted off the benefits of writing about books back when there were far fewer people doing it and they had way more cachet than they do today.
1
12
In 2009 nobody ever said of a book, “this should be a thread at best”. Even the fluffiest faddish business book was given benefit of doubt of having a decent essay’s worth of content to it. Books meant something beyond just being an intellectual calling card for “thought leaders”
1
20
I think the book as a mainstream medium is possibly dead. Now new books are of the following types:
1. Personal brand calling card
2. Scholarly specialist things
3. B2B middleware for movies/TV, incidentally also read by nerds
4. Reactionary memberberries for waldenponders
6
3
45
Yep books as decor, though that’s always been the case to a degree
Quote Tweet
Replying to @vgr
1
10
I think all the paper-book supremacists gloating at the plateauing of ebooks are misreading what’s happened. It’s not that p-books are fighting back, it’s that blogs etc are undermining both now. The p-book resurgence is a transient domestic cozy reactionary thing. Doomed.
4
1
11
Replying to
I don't think this is quite true 😆
Ebook plateau partly due to weird econ stuff but also paper books = aesthetically preferable *and* resilient tech superior to ebooks in many ways
(I'm no pbook supremacist, read lots on kindle too & all for new book forms/tech!)
2
1
Replying to
I think the simpler explanation is publisher resistance to amazon's pricing dominance in ebooks. The aesthetic preference fits into my case 4 (waldenponding memberberries).
2
The resilience point I believe to be way overstated: people simply don't care. They're willing to risk loss of 99% of books. It's like activists think people care about privacy way more than they actually do. Whatever the actual risks, people act like recoverability will be easy.


