A couple of weeks ago I did some psychohistorical reflecting about the next decade, and decided it should be called the Searing Twenties. The mood and energy I’m sensing is a darker, rougher version of the Roaring Twenties a century ago.https://twitter.com/vgr/status/1205735286761615360 …
-
-
Okay, changing this call based on Rob’s points. To the extent Zoomers rhyme with Silents they’ll be progressive reformers rather than conformists within Millennial institutions. Domestic cozy Firefly rebel ships rather than starship interiors. https://twitter.com/robsalk/status/1211098235365814273?s=21 …https://twitter.com/robsalk/status/1211098235365814273 …
Show this thread -
Moving on. “Roaring” is unambiguously positive valence despite hidden troubles. Is the valence of “Searing” as the anchor adjective positive or negative. It is ambiguous tending negative. High energy but not positive. Think climate change as core narrative motif.
Show this thread -
Overall gestalt (no specific predictions yet): high, tumultuous, damaging energy, prone to both conflict and creation. There will be burn victims and famous fire fighters. Devastated landscapes (real and allegorical) and new growth amid the ashes.
Show this thread -
I’ll possibly turn this into a blogchain, but this thread is by way of being a set of prolegomena. Initial RFC open as I tune the Prime Radiant on this thing. The name of the decade is not up for negotiation, we’re playing for the Big Meme here
Show this thread -
The 1920s actually started with a short, sharp depression and ended with the big one. Should we expect a repeat? https://twitter.com/illiteralworst/status/1211106290274988033?s=21 … https://twitter.com/illiteralworst/status/1211106290274988033 …
This Tweet is unavailable.Show this thread -
For different reasons, I think we can expect a crash in the next couple of years. India has already crashed (GDP but not stocks). China is jittery. The US and EU could go either way depending on politics. A decade out, I don’t know. I’m not incl9ned to call a decade long boom.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
That's a misreading. The Silents were not "organization men." That was the Veterans, who were old enough to have a stake. The Silents were the most progressive, disruptive generation in US history, though most of their accomplishments are credited to young Boomers.
-
Depends on which end you’re talking about though doesn’t it? Someone born in 1930 would have grown up through depression and war and joined the workforce around 1950 just a few years before William Whyte did his org-man studies. They’d be early career.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Frankly, my hope is with the post-Millennials, whatever we're calling them. The Millennial cake is baked. What we see is what we get.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The Silents gave purpose to the Veterans and gave effect to the Boomers coming up behind them, who were enthusiastic & numerous, but too young to find their asses with both hands. It is unsurprising they are now lost without them. That role is my hope for the Post-Millennials
-
What do you see as being the millennial's role?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.