If you ever release a “simplified form” of an idea for ease of illustration, but it gets traction, people will forget all caveats and use it in place of full form, and complain loudly when it fails. The OODA loop is a good example. My double-freytag model is another. Never ELI5.
-
-
Replying to @vgr
What's the "full form" of double-Freytag? I just read Tempo last night so I'm especially curious. Is the full form the book and the simplified form just the one picture? Or is the full form online somewhere? Or is the full form inaccessible outside your mind?
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @davidad
The picture with the 6 labeled phases is the simplified form. I mention fractals in the text I think
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @vgr
I scanned ch.4 again, but didn't find any mention of fractals. Sounds related to multitemporality, so maybe crystallized more recently? Is the idea that each up-down cycle may be decomposed recursively into multiple cycles, where Double-Freytag is just the single-step 1⇒2 case?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Might have worded or differently
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.